Response to the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology’s call for comments on the Draft Ministerial Regulation on Domain Name Management
AIC Response to the HK Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2011 Code of Practice for Service Providers Second Draft
We are thankful for the opportunity to contribute our views to the second draft of the Code of Practice for Service Providers to be published pursuant to Section 88I of the Copyright Ordinance (“Draft Code”).
AIC Comments on Vietnam’s Draft Law on the sanctioning of Admin Violations in the Mgt, Provision and Use of Internet Svs and Online Info (2nd submission)
AIC expresses thanks for the continued willingness of the Ministry of Information and Communication (MoIC) to listen to concerns and suggestions from the business community as you consider the Draft Decree on the Sanctioning of Administrative Violations in the
Management, Provision and Use of Internet Services and Online information (Sanctions Decree). We are very encouraged by the continued dialogue and see this as an additional positive step as Vietnam advances to become an important ICT player in ASEAN.
On 7-8 February 2012, AIC ran a joint two-day workshop in Jakarta on using the Internet safely for children and families. The event was co-sponsored by the Ministry of Communication and Informatics. The opening address was given by the minister, his Excellency Tifatul Sembiring.
We note that Singapore has signed the revised ITU Regulations (ITRs) at the recent World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12) in Dubai. We are very concerned and somewhat surprised that Singapore has taken this stand, despite
the fact that there was no consensus reached on the treaty text and the potential damage it could have on Singapore’s economic growth and status as a regional hub for technology companies. The decision taken by many technology companies, like members of the Asia Internet Coalition, to base their regional operations in Singapore was due in no small part to the belief that Singapore is supportive of an
An Act Protecting Individual Personal Information In Information And Communications Systems In The Government And The Private Sector, Creating For This Purpose A National Privacy Commission, And For Other Purposes.
AIC Comments on Vietnam’s Draft Law on the sanctioning of Admin Violations in the Mgt Provision and Use of Internet Svcs and Online Info
AIC is concerned that the proposed decree is unclear about which provisions apply to global internet companies and contains broad definitions that fail to describe what actions would result in penalties.
Asia Internet Coalition welcomes Facebook Inc. as our latest member. Together with Yahoo, Google, eBay and Skype, the Coalition now boasts some of the biggest names in the Internet industry and aim to leverage its collective strength to engage governments across Asia to advance all its policy goals.
The AIC recognizes the importance of the internet as a driver for innovation and economic growth. The Boston Consulting Group reported in 2011 that the internet contributed HK$96 billion to the economy, which is 5.9% of Hong Kong’s GDP. It acknowledges the critical role regulations play in ensuring that the internet can continue to grow and play an important role for China’s economy. It is from this perspective that the AIC offers its comments.
The AIC has supported a public forum to discuss the Evidence Act amendments in Malaysia. The amendments have generated a significant level of interest among Malaysians such as how the amendments will affect them. We lent support so that Malaysians could discuss the issue. The AIC believes in the value of an open and free internet and takes an interest in supporting discussions that can help such an objective.
AIC supports with the objective of laying down a DP regime that seeks to create a balance between the need to protect individual’s
personal data against organization’s need to obtain and process such data for legitimate and reasonable purposes. The AIC would like to emphasize that these equally important objectives are not necessarily conflicting and it is critical that, in language and implementation, the law ensures prevention of misuse of personal information in a manner that does not impede industry’s capacity to innovate and use information for purposes that will benefit society.
Whilst this Act is well intentioned, we believe that more needs to be done to ensure that efficiency, fairness and innovation are not compromised. We encourage the CGSO to ensure that there is adequate advanced consultation on future drafts of the bill, as well as the CNII categories.